9th Circuit Court Places Hold on Nationwide Injunction Against Trump Asylum Limits

Even FoxNews admits it!

Trump-shaped 9th Circuit hands White House major win on asylum policy

The Supreme Court has delivered a devastating blow to the US asylum system

No refugees will be resettled in the US in October, leaving hundreds in limbo around the world

The Supreme Court Should Tell Trump He Is Not Above the Law

BUT

Friday’s 5 court rulings against President Donald Trump

A Federal Judge Temporarily Blocked Trump’s Plan To Block Immigrants From Entering The US Without Proving They Could Get Health Insurance

Elections have consequences that last a lifetime!

Abortion, Guns And Gay Rights On The Docket For Supreme Court’s New Term

The Courts and SCOTUS have made decisions that have Impacted PEOPLES’ LIVES!

Trump’s War on Asylum-Seekers is Endangering Pregnant Women

ASYLUM SEEKER DENIED US ENTRY BY TRUMP ADMINISTRATION KIDNAPPED FIVE HOURS AFTER RETURN TO MEXICO

Mexico’s Capitulation to Trump Has Put Thousands of Lives in Danger

President Trump Wages War on Government and Expertise, and Our Institutions Surrender

Not just Kavanaugh: Another alarming reason to fear the Supreme Court

Don’t Know Much About the 14th Amendment

The 14th Amendment Applies to EVERYONE in EVERY Jurisdiction

Yick Wo And The Equal Protection Clause

The Supreme Court determined that the ordinance was unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment’s “equal protection” clause – because of the unequal application of the law. It was the very first Supreme Court case to use this standard – and it did so almost 80 years before the Court’s landmark rulings striking down Jim Crow statutes enacted in the segregationist South.

But that wasn’t the only precedent set by this remarkable case. Yick Wo was not an American citizen – because by law he wasn’t allowed to be. Yet the Court ruled that his rights were still protected by the 14th Amendment because it says that no state shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” It does not limit that protection only to citizens.

Since the case was decided in 1886, the decision has been cited in more than 160 opinions in the Supreme Court alone.

https://www.theconstitutionproject.com/portfolio/yick-wo-and-the-equal-protection-clause/

Citizenship Rights, Equal Protection, Apportionment, Civil War Debt

Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

14th Amendment Summary

Do Undocumented Immigrants Have Constitutional Rights?

YES!!!

Justice Sotomayor warns the Supreme Court is doing “extraordinary” favors for Trump

Trump administration testing rapid asylum review, deportation process in Texas

THE LAW!

8 U.S. Code § 1158.Asylum

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum

Keith Olbermann predicted this in 2010!

Sanctuary cities, explained

Explore More

My Country is Breaking The Law (I went through a CBP Checkpoint on The Interstate IN TEXAS)

July 23, 2019 2 tags

Twitter Shares ICE Expelled 33 Immigrant Children Back To Guatemala After A Judge Said They Couldn’t CBP memo contradicts Greyhound on bus raids All The President’s Immigration Lawsuits Hundreds deported

DACA – Dreamers with … a Dream

November 12, 2019 2 tags

Twitter Shares What ending DACA could cost the U.S. economy What happens to DACA holders if the Supreme Court allows Trump to end the program? Why the legal issue at

History Repeats Itself, it just changes the Labels. George Wallace and Alabama in 1963 is Greg Abbott and Texas in 2024.

January 27, 2024 2 tags

Twitter Shares Brown v. Board of Education U.S. Supreme Court says Texas can’t block federal agents from the border “The high court’s order effectively maintains long-running precedent that the federal