My take on @Lawrence on how SCOTUS mishandled Trump’s autocratic claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution of his Constitution-defying scheme to overturn his electoral loss of the presidency ⬇️https://t.co/kpV7c114bK

— Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ (@tribelaw) February 29, 2024

The Supreme Court's new Code of Conduct urges recusal to avoid the *appearance* of impropriety.

So Justice Thomas should recuse from Trump's immunity case. How could he appear impartial given his wife Ginni’s role in Jan. 6?

The code is a sham. pic.twitter.com/3MB4evghjv

— Robert Reich (@RBReich) March 1, 2024

Here’s a thread on the public’s right to a speedy trial, which explains why the Supreme Court has set an expedited schedule and will work to decide the immunity question promptly in the federal election interference case against Donald Trump. /1

— Barb McQuade (@BarbMcQuade) March 3, 2024

The fact that the Supreme Court is even considering Trump’s immunity case is horrific.

It should be clear to anyone who cares about democracy that no one is above the law.

But while a Supreme Court packed with Trump’s appointees won’t save us, there is something we can all do:…

— Dan Rather (@DanRather) February 29, 2024

Rep. Jamie Raskin calls on the Supreme Court to immediately rule on the Trump immunity claim. "they're going to hear it on April 20 seconds, I hope that we will get a decision from the court April 23rd or 24th." pic.twitter.com/pIRx3a2XsW

— Sarah Reese Jones (@PoliticusSarah) March 3, 2024

Donald Trump claims that Obama, Bush, and Biden would all be in prison unless the court rules that the president of the United States has immunity from prosecution. pic.twitter.com/wbeOkPUcAC

— Republican Voters Against Trump (@AccountableGOP) February 7, 2024

The D.C. Circuit Court’s decision rejecting Donald Trump’s bid for immunity is “a masterful example of judicial craftsmanship on many levels,” @gtconway3d writes. “The opinion deserves a place in every constitutional-law casebook, and, most important—are you listening, members of… pic.twitter.com/uCjRj8cpQT

— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) February 6, 2024

.@Lawrence on the Trump immunity ruling: "This is one of those opinions that says to America, it says to every high school history student in America, you're not crazy. It's what you thought. It's what we've always thought for the entire history of the Republic." pic.twitter.com/I3YczH2NXy

— All In with Chris Hayes (@allinwithchris) February 7, 2024

Conservatives lawyer @gtconway3d on the appeals court ruling denying immunity to Trump:

“This opinion is even tighter than the Supreme Court opinion in the United States against Nixon, and I just don’t see how Trump can get this thing overturned. He might be able to delay a… pic.twitter.com/hpZOEPrpgu

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) February 7, 2024

Weird how none of the previous Presidents in US history never had to worry about "complete immunity" because they weren't walking, talking, crooked crime machines compulsively committing crimes.

IF YOU DON'T DO CRIMES, YOU DON'T NEED COMPLETE IMMUNITY. pic.twitter.com/EaqYjbE6UX

— BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️ (@mmpadellan) February 6, 2024

Stephen Miller is melting down over the court denying Trump absolute immunity. pic.twitter.com/TfKy5vDqG1

— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) February 6, 2024