Alan Dershowitz’s view would destroy our constitutional system, @justinamash writes in @PostEverything https://t.co/dFtiUVYbHw

— Washington Post Opinions (@PostOpinions) January 31, 2020

“Alexander Hamilton, writing in Federalist 65, explained that high crimes ‘are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.’” https://t.co/KmjcpAyrPU

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) January 31, 2020

“A republic — if you can keep it.” With charlatans like @AlanDersh at the gates, I fear we would soon lose it. Happily, no real student of our Constitution would take seriously the made-for-TV views @AlanDersh is bellowing to defend @realDonaldTrump.https://t.co/vaEhEqkkfC

— Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ (@tribelaw) January 30, 2020

For anyone tempted to take Trump Defense Team's argument that Presidents can solicit foreign interference in our elections; I'll raise you George Washington: "foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government." https://t.co/hdvlLePCeo

— John Avlon (@JohnAvlon) January 30, 2020

Pres. Trump's counsel Alan Dershowitz: "If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment." https://t.co/8eDXJbxaT6 pic.twitter.com/SXR2Ms69Mi

— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) January 29, 2020

Alan Dershowitz, one of President Trump's defense lawyers, argued that anything a president does to get re-elected could be considered in the nation's interest and is therefore not impeachable.https://t.co/ptlmibuTni

— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 29, 2020

Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz has argued that a politician trying to win reelection is acting in the national interest, and therefore a quid pro quo aimed at boosting reelection chances can't be impeachable.

Sen. Blumenthal: Dershowitz's argument is "damaging to our democracy." pic.twitter.com/9bmlraCBMs

— Anderson Cooper 360° (@AC360) January 30, 2020

.@AlanDersh’s attempt to hijack my colleague @nikobowie’s earlier writing to support his preposterous thesis fails, as Bowie shows here. And Dershowitz’s claim that Bowie is wrong here conveniently mangles Bowie’s current explanation. https://t.co/5lVd4wzak3

— Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ (@tribelaw) January 28, 2020

There is a strong consensus among legal scholars and impeachment experts that the arguments Dershowitz is making right now on the Senate floor… are bogus. He’s arguing that there must be a crime to impeach a president. https://t.co/Cj6opkMVOo

— Marshall Cohen (@MarshallCohen) January 28, 2020

Kudos to ⁦@NRO⁩ for acknowledging the obvious and thus making the only honest case against impeachment. Their honesty highlights the dishonesty of the rest of the right. https://t.co/LFlE1K2Fo6

— Max Boot 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@MaxBoot) January 24, 2020

Trump’s legal team filed defense memos that offered weak legal arguments and pathetic factual ones https://t.co/qp2OjiVuS5

— Bloomberg Opinion (@opinion) January 23, 2020

On #CNNSOTU w/ @brikeilarcnn, @AlanDersh and @JeffreyToobin debate about Trump's legal strategy ahead of this week's impeachment trial. https://t.co/NIeOvUAJKn

— State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) January 19, 2020

"No, I wasn't wrong. I have a more sophisticated basis for my argument now."

Harvard Law Professor @AlanDersh, who is part of the President's impeachment trial legal team, addresses a historical inconsistency in his position on impeachment requirements.https://t.co/BDC7UXAD6x pic.twitter.com/815e91uze4

— Anderson Cooper 360° (@AC360) January 21, 2020

.@Eliehonig explains the history behind impeachable offenses according to the US Constitution and how they can be applied to President Trump's Senate impeachment trial. https://t.co/Rzzt71dVlH pic.twitter.com/DOxmzmUnmZ

— CNN This Morning with Kasie Hunt (@CNNThisMorning) January 20, 2020

"Barr Once Contradicted Trump’s Claim That Abuse of Power Is Not Impeachable"…

"In a memo for the Trump team during the Russia investigation, the attorney general wrote that presidents who misuse their authority are subject to impeachment."https://t.co/DY5dyDOapW

— Rachel Maddow MSNBC (@maddow) January 21, 2020

If James Madison was alive and tweeting, he'd dunk on the Wall Street Journal's editorial against impeachment today. Here's why: https://t.co/RxsyUXGFSG

— David French (@DavidAFrench) January 23, 2020

Turley, a key GOP witness in the House inquiry, takes issue with the crux of the Trump defense argument https://t.co/11ES3aVGCp

— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 22, 2020

1/2 @AlanDersh claim that impeachable offenses are limited to crimes, particularly his reliance on argumnts of Judge Curtis as defense counsel in Andrew Johnson case, rests in part on article by HLS asst prof Nikolas Bowie. I dissect that article here… https://t.co/v00v8FUYWt

— Frank Bowman (@FOBowman3) January 19, 2020

.@AlanDersh is grossly misstating law, history, and even the arguments in the Johnson Senate impeachment trial. He’s not to be trusted. Trump’s mendacity has sadly rubbed off on my former colleague. Read my @washingtonpost op-ed laying it all out: https://t.co/QMcotKawIS

— Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ (@tribelaw) January 20, 2020

Want to know who Pam Bondi is? Here's a primer, complete with illegal activity by Trump. https://t.co/j2Ryjh9Wzp

— Citizens for Ethics (@CREWcrew) January 22, 2020